top of page

The Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution and its Application to Ladakh

Aimed at protecting the rights and interests of tribal communities in specific regions of the country, the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution is a crucial provision. By examining historical contexts, political discourses, as well as socio-economic realities, this article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Sixth Schedule and its relevance in the India of today. Delving into its origins, significance and implication, this article examines the Sixth Schedule with a particular focus on Ladhakh’s demand for its inclusion.

An Illustration on the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution

Illustration by The Geostrata

Prior to the country’s independence, tribal communities found across the subcontinent had distinct systems of governance that operated autonomously from the colonial administration. Rooted deeply in the socio-cultural practices of the tribal groups, their governance systems played a significant role in maintaining their identities as distinct from the people of the mainland. However, the colonial era was synonymous with the erosion of tribal autonomy due to various factors such as land grabbing, displacement and exploitation. 

Numerous Constituent Assembly debates reflected the concerns of tribal leaders regarding the protection of their customary laws, land rights and cultural practices.

As a result, the framers of the Indian Constitution incorporated the Sixth Schedule to provide a constitutional framework for the administration of tribal areas. The key provisions of the same include the establishment of autonomous district councils and regional councils with legislative, executive, and financial powers.



Since its inception, the Sixth Schedule has been implemented across regions with states like Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram having autonomous councils with varying degrees of authority. These councils have proven to play a vital role in promoting local self-governance while preserving tribal culture and addressing socio-economic disparities as well. However, insufficient devolution of powers, extreme bureaucratic interference and conflicts over jurisdiction have posed challenges, thus hampering the effective functioning of these councils. 

As a significant constitutional provision, the Sixth Schedule was initially set up to address the unique socio-economic and political realities of tribal communities and populations in specific regions of the countries.

Enshrined within the framework of India’s federal structure, the Sixth Schedule is an embodiment of the nation’s commitment to protecting the rights while preserving the culture and empowering the indigenous people who reside in these designated areas. 


The recent few years have seen a growing demand from sections of Ladakh for the extension of the Sixth Schedule to the region. This demand appears to be stemming from the aspiration to protect the distinct identity, culture and resources of the people of Ladakh. Moreover,  the demand also reflects the desire for greater political empowerment and autonomy in the processes of decision-making. Situated in the Northernmost region of India, Ladakh is famous for its geographic and demographic features.

The area is home to diverse communities such as Ladakhi Buddhists (40%), Shia Muslims (46%), and small tribal groups (80%). In the political discourse of independent India, Ladakh faces neglect and marginalisation despite being a rich hub of cultural heritage.

Ladakh is distinguished by its vast plateaus, snow-capped peaks, and high-altitude desert landscape. The district of Leh and the district of Kargil, each with a unique topography and cultural identity, make up the region. Ladakh has a varied population makeup, with a sizable Shia Muslim community in Kargil and a preponderance of Ladakhi Buddhists in the Leh district.

Small groups of native tribes, like the Brokpa, Changpa, and Dard, each with unique customs and ways of life, are also present. The area's cultural mosaic is further enhanced by the increasing number of immigrants and migrants from other regions of India.

Historically, Ladakh has felt a sense of neglect and marginalisation with the claims that its unique cultural and strategic resources have often been overlooked by the priorities of the central and state governments. This experience of perceived neglect has further fueled grievances among the local population, leading to demands for greater autonomy and self-governance. 

Ladakh's quest for autonomy has been shaped by various factors. Of these, cultural identity is primary. The region’s distinct cultural heritage is shaped by its Buddhist and Muslim communities that have cultivated a sense of pride and identity amongst the people. This gives rise to a local desire to preserve and promote these cultural traditions and enjoy greater autonomy. 

There are also certain geopolitical considerations. Lying at the crossroads of India, China and Pakistan, Ladakh holds strategic geopolitical importance. However, the overshadowing of the same by security concerns has led to calls for greater local control over governance and development initiatives.

The region's proximity to conflict zones, such as the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China and the Line of Control (LoC) with Pakistan, has a direct bearing on its security concerns and development priorities.

Furthermore, Ladakh's political representation and decision-making authority have come under scrutiny due to its status as a Union Territory, which was established after Jammu and Kashmir was reorganised in 2019. Some welcomed the move as a step towards resolving long-standing issues, but others expressed concerns about Ladakh's unique identity possibly being diluted within the Union Territory's broader administrative structure.

Ladakh confronts difficulties concerning infrastructure development, economic opportunities, and access to basic services despite its natural beauty and rich cultural heritage. Aspirations for equitable resource distribution and inclusive development propel the pursuit of autonomy.

Given this, Ladakh's request to be added to the Indian Constitution's Sixth Schedule can be interpreted as an attempt to address the region's long-standing grievances and demands for increased autonomy. In order to preserve its natural resources, assert its cultural identity, and take a more active role in determining its future, Ladakh is requesting special provisions similar to those granted to other tribal regions.

Ladakh’s demand for this special provision of the Constitution is rooted in several compelling rationales. Firstly, since the region inhabits diverse cultural communities, their distinct languages, cultural traditions and socio-economic practices require both preservation as well as promotion. The Sixth Schedule is perceived as a provision to safeguard the unique cultural identities from external influences and exploitations to ensure their continuity and flourishment.  

Apart from the people, Ladakh is also home to serene landscapes, rich biodiversity and other invaluable natural assets that need overdue protection from over-exploitation and environmental degradation. Since the region’s ecosystem is fragile, it is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, global warming and unsustainable development practices.

Obtaining the status of the Sixth Schedule, Ladakh could hope to gain greater control over its natural resources and implement its indigenous measures of conservation that are tailored to local needs and priorities. 

In the political realm, Ladakh’s demand for the Sixth Schedule status also reflects the region’s aspiration for greater political empowerment through  a degree of self-governance. This is in tandem with the region’s demand for autonomy in decision-making processes related to matters of governance, administration and resource management.

By establishing autonomous councils with legislative, executive and financial powers, Ladakh is hoping to improve local participation in democratic processes while also addressing the socio-economic needs of its diverse set of locals. 

It is also imperative for such a Constitutional provision to address the historical grievances of those marginalised within the political framework of India who suffer from limited representation and inadequate attention to its personalised challenges and aspirations. Thus, the demand for the Sixth Schedule comes from a historical context of neglect, underdevelopment and lack of political agency. By seeking provisions akin to other tribal areas, Ladakh seeks to redress the grievances of its people and assert its rightful place within the Indian federal structure.  


Implementing the Sixth Schedule in Ladakh appears to be a matter of utmost urgency owing to various socio-economic challenges faced by the regions. Despite its apparent strategic significance, Ladakh trails behind other regions when it comes to basic infrastructure such as roads, electricity, healthcare facilities and educational institutions.  Due to inadequate infrastructure, the region’s socio-economic development lags behind and limits its residents’ access to essential services and opportunities.

Moreover, it is important to note that the region’s economy is primarily agrarian with agriculture, animal husbandry and tourism being the main sources of income for the locals. Due to limited access to markets, lack of investment and seasonal fluctuations, livelihood security and sustainable economic growth become challenging.

As a result, the youth migrate in large numbers to urban areas in search of better educational and employment opportunities. This is of significant concern in Ladakh since the lack of diversified economic activities and job prospects within the region leads to brain drain and unemployment amongst the educated youth. 

With its monasteries, religious festivities and traditional handicrafts, Ladakh’s cultural heritage is a source of great pride and identity for its people. However, rapid socio-economic changes, urbanisation and external influences pose threats to the preservation of its rich cultural heritage. This raises the need for concentrated efforts to promote and boost cultural preservation and conservation of heritage under initiatives that are tailored to local sensitivities and aspirations.


Ladakh’s demand for Sixth Schedule status calls for a comparative analysis with other Sixth Schedule areas to contextualise the status within the broader framework of tribal autonomy movements and governance models in India. A comparison with areas such as Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram reveals certain similarities and differences regarding historical trajectories, administrative structures and socio-cultural dynamics.

While the application of the Schedule in different regions has its unique contexts and challenges, they all share the common objective of promoting welfare and tribal self-governance to protect indigenous rights and foster inclusive development.

Ladakh’s demand for the same aligns with these overarching objectives and underscores the need for personalised solutions that resonate with the region’s specific socio-cultural and geopolitical realities.

Ladakh’s demand sparked debates within political circles and legal forums on many counts. Advocates for the Sixth Schedule argue that it would duly address the historical grievances and cultivate inclusive development while opponents raise concerns about the feasibility and implications of the decision. From a legal standpoint, the imposition of the Sixth Schedule in Ladakh would require careful consideration of constitutional provisions and precedents.

At both the regional as well as national levels, the demand has elicited varied responses. The Union Territory administration of Ladakh has expressed keenness to consider the demand for the Sixth Schedule status. As a result, efforts have been made to engage with local stakeholders like political representatives, community leaders and civil society organisations to assess the feasibility of such a move.

However, the administration has also been emphasising the need for broader consultations and consensus building before finalising any formal decision.

The central government has also taken note of Ladakh’s demand and has initiated discussions to explore the potential implications along with the legal frameworks involved. The government at the national level has approached the matter with caution and deliberation given the constitutional and administrative complexities of extending Sixth Schedule provisions to a Union Territory. 

The central government underscores the importance of ensuring that any decision aligns with the larger national interest and constitutional provisions while also keeping in mind the region’s unique challenges and aspirations.

However, the demand for the Sixth Schedule in Ladakh raises important constitutional and legal questions that call for careful examination and scrutiny. The Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution provides for the administration of tribal areas through district and regional councils that are autonomous in nature.

However, as in the case of Ladakh, the applicability of the Schedule in areas that have been created through recent reorganisations poses interpretational challenges. Examining the scope and applicability of the Sixth Schedule provisions to Union Territories requires a nuanced understanding of constitutional principles and precedents.

Extension of these provisions to Ladakh would necessitate amendments to the existing legal frameworks which includes the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 under which Ladakh was established as a Union Territory. 

Any such amendments would need to be carefully drafted to ensure compatibility with constitutional mandates and the specific needs of the region. Legal experts and constitutional scholars play a crucial role in guiding policy-makers through the complexities of the legal process and ensuring adherence to due process and procedural norms.

Additionally, Ladakh’s demand for the Sixth Schedule status carries significant political implications at the regional as well as national level. Within Ladakh itself, the demand has triggered debates amongst political parties, interest groups and communities.

While one side of stakeholders views the Sixth Schedule as a means to empower local institutions and address historical grievances, others raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest with administrative complexities and inter-community relations. To manage and accommodate these divergent viewpoints would mean fostering consensus to ensure the legitimacy and effectiveness of any decision regarding Ladakh’s constitutional status. 

At the national level, the demands intersect with broader debates on minority rights, federalism and governance models in tribal areas. Policy-makers must consider the implications of extending Sixth Schedule provisions to Ladakh within the larger context of India’s quasi-federal structure and constitutional framework. 

Balancing the aspirations of the locals within the imperatives of national security and unity requires paying attention to development while adopting a nuanced and inclusive approach that delves into the diverse interests and perspectives that are at play.

Diverse stakeholder viewpoints exist regarding Ladakh's request for inclusion in the Sixth Schedule. The proposal has garnered support from civil society organisations, tribal leaders, and local communities who emphasise the importance of protecting indigenous rights and achieving greater self-governance. But some express scepticism and caution, especially in light of the possible effects on regional stability and inter-community relations.

A multifaceted strategy is needed to address the issues surrounding Ladakh's demand for Sixth Schedule status. Conciliating conflicting interests, making sure implementation procedures are efficient, and fostering agreement among stakeholders are important obstacles.

To move forward, policymakers must have meaningful conversations with all parties involved and develop plans of action that strike a balance between the goals of the Ladakhi people and the larger interests of the country.


Thus, it can be concluded that the Sixth Schedule represents a significant constitutional provision aimed at safeguarding and promoting the rights and interests of tribal communities in India. Ladakh’s demand for the inclusion of the same provision underscores the complex dynamics of identity, autonomy and governance in the region. 

The call for Sixth Schedule status is a reflection of global and Indian indigenous rights recognition, decentralisation, and empowerment movements. It emphasises how crucial it is to acknowledge and take into account the various socio-cultural identities and goals that make up the fabric of the country.

Policymakers must prioritise the opinions and concerns of local communities, maintain transparency, and have meaningful conversations as they work through the complexity of Ladakh's demands.

Going forward, India's tribal areas can learn a lot from Ladakh's path to becoming a part of the Sixth Schedule, including inclusive governance, democratic decision-making, and sustainable development. India can preserve its constitutional ideals and fortify the ties of unity among its diverse communities and cultures by adhering to the principles of autonomy, equity, and cultural diversity. The path ahead appears to be fraught with challenges, yet it nonetheless presents the opportunity to foster greater inclusivity, equity and resilience in the federal structure of India.




Recent Posts

See All

2 comentarios

the piece aptly highlights the importance of the 6th schedule amidst the broader context of indigenous rights recognition and decentralisation.

Me gusta

Important to address policy reforms in the region

Me gusta
bottom of page